Author Topic: Advocates for disabled decry proposed Medicaid cuts  (Read 75 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline agate

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 8588
  • MS diagnosed 1980
  • Location: Pacific Northwest
Advocates for disabled decry proposed Medicaid cuts
« on: June 23, 2017, 04:11:15 pm »
If cuts to Medicaid include sharp reductions in home and community based care, the nursing home industry will be celebrating. Many people who might have been cared for in their homes will have to go to nursing homes without home-based care services.

From MedPage Today, June 23, 2017:

Quote
Advocates for Disabled Decry Proposed Medicaid Cuts

House ACA repeal bill would affect home, community-based services

by Joyce Frieden, News Editor, MedPage Today

WASHINGTON -- Not only will disabled people be harmed by the Medicaid cuts included in the House Republicans' bill to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, the cuts likely won't end up saving money, several speakers said Monday at an event organized by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).

The American Health Care Act that was passed by the House last month included $880 billion in cuts to Medicaid and also called for the program to be turned into a per-capita cap arrangement, in which states would receive a set amount from the federal government for each Medicaid enrollee. Per-capita cap funding would represent a "fundamental restructuring" of the Medicaid program, under which the federal government currently pays states a percentage match based on how much the state spends on its Medicaid program, said Marty Ford, senior executive officer in the public policy office at The Arc of the United States, a non-profit organization that provides services to the intellectually and developmentally disabled. There is no cap on the amount the federal government will pay in matching funds.

'This [bill] would end the federal government's guarantee of matching state spending on actual costs, and once that's gone, we feel it's unlikely we'd ever get it back," Ford said to the large crowd in the Senate hearing room. "The burden would shift to the states to pick [up] the costs."

Speakers were very concerned about how the cuts would affect Medicaid's program for home- and community-based services (HBCS) for disabled patients; the program provides assistance at home with bathing, dressing, and other activities of daily living.
The success of current HBCS programs "is evident in the reduction in institutional services," said Nancy Thaler, deputy secretary for developmental programs at the Pennsylvania Department of Human Services. "Fourteen states and the District of Columbia have no public institutions [for the disabled] at all. This is important because not only do people with disabilities want to live in the community, they have a much better quality of life and the cost of community services [is] considerably less." For example, "the average per-person cost of a public institution is over $265,000 a year while the average cost of HCBS services is about $43,000."

As a result, by cutting Medicaid funding for programs such as HCBS, federal and state governments "might [actually] end up spending more money," since many patients who don't have access to HCBS would end up in institutions, said H. Stephen Kaye, PhD, of the Institute for Health & Aging at the University of California San Francisco. "Aside from other things wrong with it, it's not a good strategy for saving money."

That's true for several reasons, Kaye told MedPage Today in an interview. "There are some people for whom it's more expensive in the community, but it's very few," he said. "Most people [cost less]. One reason is housing costs are not included in HCBS, whereas with a person in [an institution], you're reimbursing for housing and food. The other thing is, it's not cheap; even [though there are] not that many nurses or doctors, it's still a really expensive model of care."

And people should "disabuse themselves of any thoughts" that states will make up the difference once Medicaid funds are cut, said Thaler. "If states have to compensate for cuts, the waiting list will simply grow."

The importance of HBCS services should not be underestimated, according to Andrea LaVant, a teen program specialist with the Girl Scouts of the Nation's Capital. "I have a friend who, while otherwise independent, can't leave her house on days when no personal attendant comes [to assist her] because she requires help getting her shoes on," she said.

LaVant, who is herself disabled due to a neuromuscular condition, said the services she receives at home are vital to helping her maintain her own independence. "There are countless others who count on Medicaid to [help them] lead their lives ... I beg of you -- not only for myself but millions like me whose lives will be literally destroyed -- to save Medicaid."

President Trump in a closed-door session was reported to have called the Republican health care bill "mean" on June 13, according to Time (June 13):

Quote

President Trump Calls House Health Care Bill 'Mean'

Alan Fram / AP

(WASHINGTON) President Donald Trump told Republican senators Tuesday that the House-passed health care bill is "mean" and urged them to craft a version that is "more generous," congressional sources said.

The president's comments, at a White House lunch with 15 GOP senators, came as Senate Republican leaders' attempts to write their own health care package have been slowed by disagreements between their party's conservative and moderates.

Trump's remarks were a surprising critique of a Republican-written House measure whose passage he lobbied for and praised. At a Rose Garden ceremony minutes after the bill's narrow House passage, Trump called it "a great plan."

His comments also seemed to undercut efforts by Senate conservatives to include restrictions in their chamber's bill, such as cutting the Medicaid health care program for the poor and limiting the services insurers must cover. Moderate GOP senators have been pushing to ease those efforts.

The sources say the president did not specify what aspects of the bill he was characterizing.

Trump's comments were described by two GOP congressional sources who received accounts of Tuesday's White House lunch. They spoke on condition of anonymity to reveal a closed-door conversation.

Their descriptions of Trump's words differed slightly.One source said Trump called the House bill "mean, mean, mean" and said, "We need to be more generous, more kind."

The other source said Trump used a vulgar phrase to describe the House bill and told the senators, "We need to be more generous."



MS Speaks--online for 13 years

SPMS, diagnosed 1980. Avonex 2001-2004. Copaxone 2007-2010.

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
0 Replies
40 Views
Last post September 27, 2016, 03:27:32 pm
by agate
0 Replies
37 Views
Last post January 18, 2017, 08:52:12 pm
by agate
0 Replies
78 Views
Last post February 04, 2018, 04:53:21 pm
by agate
0 Replies
36 Views
Last post November 19, 2018, 09:07:29 pm
by agate
0 Replies
7 Views
Last post May 22, 2020, 08:04:44 pm
by agate