Debate on whether wearable technology should replace clinical examination for MS patients

The Multiple Sclerosis Journal often includes a debate on a controversial topic, with one author (or groups of authors) stating the pro side and another stating the con side, followed by a commentary that serves as a summary. The topic in the August 1, 2020, issue is "We should monitor our patients with wearable technology instead of clinical examination." This idea could revolutionize the way MS patients associate with their neurologists:


The statement in favor of wearable technology --the authors are at the University of California San Francisco:


https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1352458520922762


The statement opposing wearable technology as a replacement for clinical examination--the authors are at Istanbul University:


https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1352458520908769


The commentary:


https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1352458520930985