Author Topic: Debate on whether wearable technology should replace clinical examination for MS patients  (Read 4 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline agate

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 8629
  • MS diagnosed 1980
  • Location: Pacific Northwest
The Multiple Sclerosis Journal often includes a debate on a controversial topic, with one author (or groups of authors) stating the pro side and another stating the con side, followed by a commentary that serves as a summary. The topic in the August 1, 2020, issue is "We should monitor our patients with wearable technology instead of clinical examination." This idea could revolutionize the way MS patients associate with their neurologists:


The statement in favor of wearable technology --the authors are at the University of California San Francisco:


https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1352458520922762


The statement opposing wearable technology as a replacement for clinical examination--the authors are at Istanbul University:


https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1352458520908769


The commentary:


https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1352458520930985
MS Speaks--online for 14 years

SPMS, diagnosed 1980. Avonex 2001-2004. Copaxone 2007-2010.

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
0 Replies
93 Views
Last post April 07, 2016, 02:12:24 pm
by agate
0 Replies
17 Views
Last post April 24, 2020, 10:04:52 pm
by agate
0 Replies
6 Views
Last post August 01, 2020, 03:29:16 pm
by agate
0 Replies
2 Views
Last post August 25, 2020, 09:15:13 pm
by agate
0 Replies
8 Views
Last post September 15, 2020, 09:05:44 pm
by agate